It appears today that The Chief Electoral Officer from Elections Canada has made a statement on the issue. Here is the letter from Him: CBC Chief Electoral Officers statement.
So it turns out that crack investigative Journalists who broke this "greatest election fraud in history" story; "Robocalls probe centres on disposable 'burner' cellphone linked to black ops in Guelph riding." May have jumped the gun.
As it turns out, The Elections Canada Chief Electoral Officer said "Immediately following the 2011 general election, the Commissioner of Canada Elections deployed resources to investigate complaints of fraudulent or improper calls. Since then, over 700 Canadians from across the country have informed us of specific circumstances where they believe similar wrongdoing took place". This is a far cry from the media hyped number of 31000 which was solicited by The Globe and Mail, and Lead now's website.
Apparently even 700 calls is too many for some people like CBC's Kady O'Malley, but at the same time for others it is smack in the middle of the average.
H/T Stephen Taylor
I did a little quick math after this broke this afternoon, where I calculated the difference and the results.
31000 (Lead now is now claiming over 41000) - 700 = 30300 ROBOSPAM.
700 robocalls at lets say .05 cents (double the bulk as I couldn't find an actual cost, except for HERE. Racknine's site did not seem to have the available info HERE.) would run $35. Not 3500, just THIRTY FIVE DOLLARS. Even if it was $100 this could EASILY have been a rogue individual, who could have done it for ANY reason! As opposed to claims of the "Anonymous" source by Glen McGregor and Stephen Maher in this article; "Unlikely a Tory staffer could have acted alone in Pierre Poutine scam: source"
That's what broke today.
A place to express my views and blow off a little steam about politics.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Democracy; What's good, is also what's bad about it.
What makes democracies so great is the ability of the will of the people to change that which is unjust. By this I mean Protests for the common good (ie: intergration.). What makes democracies bad is the perversion of protests by lobbyists and activists, who are only interested in getting their way (ie: Quebec students protest tuition increase, and Leadnow's attack to overturn a valid election.)
Taking the 2 examples I give;
1. The student's are mad that they will have to pay more for schooling. Understandable, yet at the same time the costs incurred with providing that education must be adequately covered as well. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/03/07/student-protest-montreal.html
2. The robocalls scandal has shown a vast separation between even the centralized Tory government and the radical nature of the Left, leading to the media acting as lobbyists/activists on their behalf. http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/14/unlikely-a-tory-staffer-could-have-acted-alone-in-pierre-poutine-scam-source/
Now I'm not saying there aren't justifiable reasons to remove a Government from power, but to do so when that Government is actually accomplishing positive goals for a Country shows an ideological desire for power, rather than overall social well being and justice. I also agree that there are times, and ideas, where University students have change the course of countries with positive results. But that is less and less the case when you live in a Country like Canada, which has all the benefits it does to offer. Protests and activism have become about getting your way, not making life better for everyone.
The same thing that makes our democracy great, can be perverted to make it all about self.
Taking the 2 examples I give;
1. The student's are mad that they will have to pay more for schooling. Understandable, yet at the same time the costs incurred with providing that education must be adequately covered as well. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/03/07/student-protest-montreal.html
2. The robocalls scandal has shown a vast separation between even the centralized Tory government and the radical nature of the Left, leading to the media acting as lobbyists/activists on their behalf. http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/14/unlikely-a-tory-staffer-could-have-acted-alone-in-pierre-poutine-scam-source/
Now I'm not saying there aren't justifiable reasons to remove a Government from power, but to do so when that Government is actually accomplishing positive goals for a Country shows an ideological desire for power, rather than overall social well being and justice. I also agree that there are times, and ideas, where University students have change the course of countries with positive results. But that is less and less the case when you live in a Country like Canada, which has all the benefits it does to offer. Protests and activism have become about getting your way, not making life better for everyone.
The same thing that makes our democracy great, can be perverted to make it all about self.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
How Robocalls play out in the HOC.
I was thinking about how the robocall affair has been playing out in the house of commons this morning. I find the narrative goes something like this:
Oppositions; "AHA GOTCHA!!"
Government; "Got us doing what, when, where?"
Oppositions; "You tell us!!"
Government; "Well we know that Frank Valeriote broke Election Canada rules, and how about Adam Carroll, will the Parliamentary hearings ever get to interview him?"
Oppositions; "BUT, BUT YOU ARE EVIL CONSERVATIVES!!!
It appears though that illegal tactics are not limited to the "Evil Conservatives", as has been shown by Vikileaks, and admissions of guilt by Frank Valeriote and Bob Rae themselves about robocalls in Guelph.
Now we find out that there may be illegal activities on the part of the NDP in an ethnic riding in Toronto. The CBC tells how both Conservative and Liberal complaints have been "brushed off" by Elections Canada, who should now find themselves under investigations of impropriety. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/03/13/voting-scarborough.html?cmp=rss
Oppositions; "AHA GOTCHA!!"
Government; "Got us doing what, when, where?"
Oppositions; "You tell us!!"
Government; "Well we know that Frank Valeriote broke Election Canada rules, and how about Adam Carroll, will the Parliamentary hearings ever get to interview him?"
Oppositions; "BUT, BUT YOU ARE EVIL CONSERVATIVES!!!
It appears though that illegal tactics are not limited to the "Evil Conservatives", as has been shown by Vikileaks, and admissions of guilt by Frank Valeriote and Bob Rae themselves about robocalls in Guelph.
Now we find out that there may be illegal activities on the part of the NDP in an ethnic riding in Toronto. The CBC tells how both Conservative and Liberal complaints have been "brushed off" by Elections Canada, who should now find themselves under investigations of impropriety. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/story/2012/03/13/voting-scarborough.html?cmp=rss
Friday, March 09, 2012
What caught my interest:
March 9, 2012.
Here are my 3 top tweets today:
If there is pre-election complaint of voter suppression against the Tories, will EC broaden it's investigation? http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/09/tory-campaign-worker-in-guelph-tweeted-robocall-warning-two-days-before-election/
@SunNewsNetwork: DISGUSTING: Child molester fights deportation to Iraq. http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2012/03/20120309-095101.html
Citizen's arrest is not vigilantism. Especially if Police refuse to act on your behalf. http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/08/vigilante-speaks-out-about-confronting-vandals
Here are my 3 top tweets today:
If there is pre-election complaint of voter suppression against the Tories, will EC broaden it's investigation? http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/09/tory-campaign-worker-in-guelph-tweeted-robocall-warning-two-days-before-election/
Citizen's arrest is not vigilantism. Especially if Police refuse to act on your behalf. http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/08/vigilante-speaks-out-about-confronting-vandals
Thursday, March 08, 2012
What caught my interest March 8, 2012.
A lot less about Robo-calls, but let's start off with the latest about Elections Canada.
Elections Canada has a fair amount to answer to, especially after reading the ATIP that was presented to start the Robo-smear. The latest buzz is how non registered voters were allowed to vote without giving an address. With the amount of Elections Canada mistakes coming to light it begs two questions; 1. If they can't manage the Electoral powers they have now, why would they even want more? 2. Why isn't there an investigation into Elections Canada in regards to all the screw ups?
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/08/voting-irregularities-marred-toronto-area-vote-in-federal-election-report/
Next we head to Quebec, where University students took to the streets to protest an increase in their tuition (which currently stands alone as the lowest in Canada.) However the demonstration turned towards violence when police were targeted with snowballs, and respond with force to break up the crowd. I feel that once any object is thrown at law enforcement, they must take every step possible to disperse the crowd prior to further escalation.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/03/08/montreal-student-protest-eye.html
More pictures and info here;
http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/photos-montreal-students-clash-with-riot-police-in-tuition-protest/
On to the separatist that will live off Canada for the rest of his life, National "Teddy" winner Gilles Duceppe! I can't even comment much here, because instead of being charged with his treason, he gets a fat Canada pension.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/07/duceppe-wins-national-waste-award
Finally I move to something that bothers me more deeply than anything else. In BC a member of our armed forces was attacked, his neck was slashed, waiting for a bus. This bothers me for a couple of reasons; 1. Our armed forces are generally peacekeepers, and the ideological mentality that would make someone perpetrate violence against any of our defenders of freedom show a sickness of the anti military viewpoint. 2. That this offender will be afforded the freedoms the victim has chosen to defend.
http://www2.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=12818bf7-d022-4e14-aed9-cdde1d578a0f
Elections Canada has a fair amount to answer to, especially after reading the ATIP that was presented to start the Robo-smear. The latest buzz is how non registered voters were allowed to vote without giving an address. With the amount of Elections Canada mistakes coming to light it begs two questions; 1. If they can't manage the Electoral powers they have now, why would they even want more? 2. Why isn't there an investigation into Elections Canada in regards to all the screw ups?
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/03/08/voting-irregularities-marred-toronto-area-vote-in-federal-election-report/
Next we head to Quebec, where University students took to the streets to protest an increase in their tuition (which currently stands alone as the lowest in Canada.) However the demonstration turned towards violence when police were targeted with snowballs, and respond with force to break up the crowd. I feel that once any object is thrown at law enforcement, they must take every step possible to disperse the crowd prior to further escalation.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2012/03/08/montreal-student-protest-eye.html
More pictures and info here;
http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/general/photos-montreal-students-clash-with-riot-police-in-tuition-protest/
On to the separatist that will live off Canada for the rest of his life, National "Teddy" winner Gilles Duceppe! I can't even comment much here, because instead of being charged with his treason, he gets a fat Canada pension.
http://www.torontosun.com/2012/03/07/duceppe-wins-national-waste-award
Finally I move to something that bothers me more deeply than anything else. In BC a member of our armed forces was attacked, his neck was slashed, waiting for a bus. This bothers me for a couple of reasons; 1. Our armed forces are generally peacekeepers, and the ideological mentality that would make someone perpetrate violence against any of our defenders of freedom show a sickness of the anti military viewpoint. 2. That this offender will be afforded the freedoms the victim has chosen to defend.
http://www2.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=12818bf7-d022-4e14-aed9-cdde1d578a0f
Wednesday, March 07, 2012
So many good blogs.
There are so many good blogs out there that give balance to the current, predominantly liberally, biased media. I just thought I would mention a few here, that stand up for truth in news rather than the one sided, half information you are probably getting now.
The first alternative isn't even a blog, but an (admittedly) right wing news station. When you watch Sun News, at least you know what to expect, unlike the Main Stream Media that actually thinks it has no bias.
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/home.html
The first alternative isn't even a blog, but an (admittedly) right wing news station. When you watch Sun News, at least you know what to expect, unlike the Main Stream Media that actually thinks it has no bias.
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/home.html
Here are just a few blogs that I regularly follow to balance my "news" diet;
Brian Lilley (Sun News): http://blogs.canoe.ca/lilleyspad/
Russ Cambell: http://russ-campbell.blogspot.com/
Stephen Taylor: http://www.stephentaylor.ca/
Moose and Squirrel: http://mooseandsquirrel.ca/
BC blue: http://bcblue.wordpress.com/
Small dead animals: http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/
Crux of the matter: http://crux-of-the-matter.com/
CAW workers voice of reason: http://paulsrants-paulsstuff.blogspot.com/
There is a whole list of Conservative bloggers that can be found at;
Blogging Tories: http://www.bloggingtories.ca/
What caught my interest, March 7, 2012.
Law and health care always attract interest from me, and today I came across a couple of each.
Health;
The tragic story of a woman discharge at 11p.m. from a hospital in Manitoba, who died as she reached her front door; http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/calls-for-inquest-into-post-er-death-141718033.html
Saskatchewan is looking for immigrants with skills, yet Doctors are unable to find any jobs? And yes we absolutely have a shortage of them: http://www.globalregina.com/doctors+having+trouble+immigrating+to+saskatchewan/6442595683/story.html
Law;
Police defend issuance of cell phone ticket to an elderly man who claims he doesn't own one. I am absolutely behind the law, but if the officer thought he saw something that wasn't, it will give weight to the "the officer was mistaken" defense: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/police-defend-issuing-of-ticket-141718633.html
Protection of property. When you put up with crap from punks, you should NOT be the one charged! http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/03/06/senior-in-court-for-bringing-vandal-to-rcmp
Weather:
Saskatoon got hit by a blizzard in the past day or two, hopefully as the old adage goes "In like a lion, out like a lamb."; http://www.leaderpost.com/sports/Photos+Winter+blast+hits+Saskatoon/6258212/story.html
And so far today, I have yet to see one Robo-story.
Health;
The tragic story of a woman discharge at 11p.m. from a hospital in Manitoba, who died as she reached her front door; http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/calls-for-inquest-into-post-er-death-141718033.html
Saskatchewan is looking for immigrants with skills, yet Doctors are unable to find any jobs? And yes we absolutely have a shortage of them: http://www.globalregina.com/doctors+having+trouble+immigrating+to+saskatchewan/6442595683/story.html
Law;
Police defend issuance of cell phone ticket to an elderly man who claims he doesn't own one. I am absolutely behind the law, but if the officer thought he saw something that wasn't, it will give weight to the "the officer was mistaken" defense: http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/police-defend-issuing-of-ticket-141718633.html
Protection of property. When you put up with crap from punks, you should NOT be the one charged! http://www.winnipegsun.com/2012/03/06/senior-in-court-for-bringing-vandal-to-rcmp
Weather:
Saskatoon got hit by a blizzard in the past day or two, hopefully as the old adage goes "In like a lion, out like a lamb."; http://www.leaderpost.com/sports/Photos+Winter+blast+hits+Saskatoon/6258212/story.html
And so far today, I have yet to see one Robo-story.
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Behind the Robocall movement.
I
think the most disturbing aspects of this article at
Canoe News are 1. “organized by some of last fall's Occupy Ottawa
ringleaders” and 2. “Neither Elections Canada nor the RCMP could
say whether they'd received any of the online petitions.”
Now
I can attribute the second aspect to the fact that it is an ongoing
investigation and protocol more than likely dictates this, even
though I don't see a conflict with admitting where you are getting
you information (especially if the information could be deemed
inflammatory, incomplete, or even incorrect. Ie: from a site like
Leadnow.ca which has been actively soliciting complaints.)
I
attribute the first to the nature of the robocall scandal itself. The
disenfranchised Left which seems unable to concede that the
Conservatives have a Majority Government. Of course they are being
spurred on by the fact that the Tories are trying to achieve their
goals in the House of Commons, and have cut debate at times (to
prevent the never ending repetition of the Opposition.)
I
was once again surprised at a Globe and Mail piece that points out
the ridiculousness of the Faux robo-call scandal. Margaret Went's
editors must be seething to run “Robo-calls? Get a grip. We'reCanadian”.
Brian Lilley gives us the lowdown on the background of some of the members of Lead Now in his Blog. And at Sun News Network in this Video.
Brian Lilley gives us the lowdown on the background of some of the members of Lead Now in his Blog. And at Sun News Network in this Video.
Monday, March 05, 2012
The Globe and Mail concedes:
Something
I usually don't do is post many articles from the far left media The
Globe and Mail, however 3 of today's articles seem to be almost a
precursor to retracting their past rhetoric on Robocalls.
In
the first article: "The
case against a Conservative conspiracy", aside from the
possibility of a training school staffer accidentally misspeaking
with a hypothetical “You didn’t hear this from me, but here’s
one thing you could do…” However they concede (unlike the Liberal
party has been able to do, even after Vikileaks), “But a vast
Conservative conspiracy to steal the general election? No.” Which
is a far cry from how they have been misrepresenting the situation
thus far, highlighted by their article soliciting complaints.
In
the second article: “If
robo-calls were meant to keep voters away, they failed miserably”,
they go so far as to concede “It seems very unlikely that these
alleged tactics greatly influenced the results of the 2011 election.”
In
the third article: “Tory
support steady despite robo-call,e-snooping uproars: poll”,
they have assessed the damage that these scandals have had on voter
support, which has been none. Nick Nano's correctly assesses that “I
think for many average Canadians who are very cynical, they find it
hard to believe that politics of any colour is ethical,”. Although
I myself would go a step further, and I would say that the
Conservative base remains unchanged because they generally agree with
rule of law, which is innocent until PROVEN guilty. Which is
something the rhetoric against the Tories as a whole has failed to
do. I am concerned at the increase of support for the Liberals
though, especially after Vikileaks was shown to be of their party's
invention. (Whether the Leader knew or not, you have to wonder if
Adam Carroll was the scapegoat for an MP.)
Sunday, March 04, 2012
Smoking gun vs Ballistic report.
Yesterday sometime I came across a blog (wish I could credit where I found it) from an NDP supporter that put out an argument against an NDP, Liberal, and Green party Coalition. In the Blog calles "Straight Goods" they point out a number of things quite correctly, which I have been finding bloggers (even on both sides obviously) have seen but have neen severely lacking in the Main Stream Media.
Case in point, when have you heard the media say that the Opposition parties are trying to invalidate the 2011 election results so there may be need of ANOTHER election? Not that it isn't out there, Pat Martin from the NDP said as much in his frist speech (found at the bottom of this lawsuit filed by RackNine) "hundreds ofthousands of phony phone calls by the Racknine rascals it makes you wonder about the legitimacy of the Conservatives 39% Majority Mandate". The endgame seems pretty clear.
But I digress; my point was not about lack of media integrity/awareness, but how the mentality of the Left and Right differ. I read in the past few days: "The left is very vocal and run on emotions. The right are silent and run on rules and facts. The left likes disarray and dysfunction, the right likes peace and order." (Found here.) The truth in this is quite apparent to me, as I have chance to interact with young people whos views are predominantly Left. The instant "Harper should be in jail" posts I see confirm a sharp lack of logic, and/or respect for the rule of law, which I myself hold quite dear.
Look at this like it were a CSI case: Where the Opposition (Lib, NDP) have a smoking gun sitting on Conservative's lap, as Bob Rae likes to say, the Government (Tories) are waiting for the ballistics report so they can catch a criminal and actually convict him. However waiting for the results of an investigation doesn't actually do the 2 things this "scandal" is intended: 1. It is intended to tarnish the reputation of the Conservatives through rhetoric and hyperbole that is so easily ingested by the "anything but Conservative" Harper Haters lefties. 2. It is to try to invalidate the 2011 election and send us to the ballot boxes again.
Right now all the Opposition has is allegations, speculations and assumption. Even if the truth is able to come out, after how difficult the left has made the investigation with the solicitation of "complaints", at best there will be an individual, maybe even a small renegade group at fault. At worst they will find out that it was actually the Opposition themselves that is at fault. Bottom line is that the "evil" Stephen Harper was more than likely unaware of any of it, nor were any of the Tory MPs.
I believe we should get to the bottom of this, find the truth, and punish the resposible. However if we had Bob Rae and Pat Martin's way, all the Conservatives would be in jails (which they are supposedly against) and we would be going back to the polls for another election.
Case in point, when have you heard the media say that the Opposition parties are trying to invalidate the 2011 election results so there may be need of ANOTHER election? Not that it isn't out there, Pat Martin from the NDP said as much in his frist speech (found at the bottom of this lawsuit filed by RackNine) "hundreds ofthousands of phony phone calls by the Racknine rascals it makes you wonder about the legitimacy of the Conservatives 39% Majority Mandate". The endgame seems pretty clear.
But I digress; my point was not about lack of media integrity/awareness, but how the mentality of the Left and Right differ. I read in the past few days: "The left is very vocal and run on emotions. The right are silent and run on rules and facts. The left likes disarray and dysfunction, the right likes peace and order." (Found here.) The truth in this is quite apparent to me, as I have chance to interact with young people whos views are predominantly Left. The instant "Harper should be in jail" posts I see confirm a sharp lack of logic, and/or respect for the rule of law, which I myself hold quite dear.
Look at this like it were a CSI case: Where the Opposition (Lib, NDP) have a smoking gun sitting on Conservative's lap, as Bob Rae likes to say, the Government (Tories) are waiting for the ballistics report so they can catch a criminal and actually convict him. However waiting for the results of an investigation doesn't actually do the 2 things this "scandal" is intended: 1. It is intended to tarnish the reputation of the Conservatives through rhetoric and hyperbole that is so easily ingested by the "anything but Conservative" Harper Haters lefties. 2. It is to try to invalidate the 2011 election and send us to the ballot boxes again.
Right now all the Opposition has is allegations, speculations and assumption. Even if the truth is able to come out, after how difficult the left has made the investigation with the solicitation of "complaints", at best there will be an individual, maybe even a small renegade group at fault. At worst they will find out that it was actually the Opposition themselves that is at fault. Bottom line is that the "evil" Stephen Harper was more than likely unaware of any of it, nor were any of the Tory MPs.
I believe we should get to the bottom of this, find the truth, and punish the resposible. However if we had Bob Rae and Pat Martin's way, all the Conservatives would be in jails (which they are supposedly against) and we would be going back to the polls for another election.
Friday, March 02, 2012
H/T Stephen Taylor for coming up with what may be the source of the 31000 complaints to Elections Canada.
Here is a copy of the complete text that would be sent to (as of Mar 2, 2012):
Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada
William H. Corbett, Commissioner of Elections Canada
Bob Paulson, Commissioner of the RCMP
Nycole Turmel, Leader, New Democratic Party
Bob Rae, Leader, Liberal Party
Louis Plamondon, Parliamentary Leader, Bloc Québécois
Elizabeth May, Leader, Green Party
" Dear Prime Minister Harper, Mr Corbett, Mr Paulson, Ms Turmel, Mr Rae, Ms. May and Mr. Plamondon,
I am gravely concerned by the Elections Canada report that has just traced illegal phone calls made during the 2011 federal election to a company that worked for the Conservative Party across the country.
The “robocalls” were apparently designed to stop non-Conservative voters from casting ballots in key ridings by falsely telling voters that the location of their polling stations had changed, causing them to go to the wrong location on election day.
This news casts doubt on the legitimacy of our Government. We need answers now, and real consequences for illegal behaviour that may have determined the outcome of our election.
I demand a full and independent public inquiry, backed by Elections Canada and the RCMP, to expose the facts about the robocall scandal and ensure that the penalty for this election fraud matches the consequences of the crime - including new elections.
We cannot allow individuals to be scapegoated for actions that benefit institutions. We need to lay the foundation for new laws to restore the integrity of Canadian elections."
Found at Lead Now.
Once again I'll say it looks like this is a ploy by the disgruntled opposition parties to try and gain a "Mulligan" (do over) because they just can't stand the thought of a Conservative Government.
Here is a copy of the complete text that would be sent to (as of Mar 2, 2012):
Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada
William H. Corbett, Commissioner of Elections Canada
Bob Paulson, Commissioner of the RCMP
Nycole Turmel, Leader, New Democratic Party
Bob Rae, Leader, Liberal Party
Louis Plamondon, Parliamentary Leader, Bloc Québécois
Elizabeth May, Leader, Green Party
" Dear Prime Minister Harper, Mr Corbett, Mr Paulson, Ms Turmel, Mr Rae, Ms. May and Mr. Plamondon,
I am gravely concerned by the Elections Canada report that has just traced illegal phone calls made during the 2011 federal election to a company that worked for the Conservative Party across the country.
The “robocalls” were apparently designed to stop non-Conservative voters from casting ballots in key ridings by falsely telling voters that the location of their polling stations had changed, causing them to go to the wrong location on election day.
This news casts doubt on the legitimacy of our Government. We need answers now, and real consequences for illegal behaviour that may have determined the outcome of our election.
I demand a full and independent public inquiry, backed by Elections Canada and the RCMP, to expose the facts about the robocall scandal and ensure that the penalty for this election fraud matches the consequences of the crime - including new elections.
We cannot allow individuals to be scapegoated for actions that benefit institutions. We need to lay the foundation for new laws to restore the integrity of Canadian elections."
Found at Lead Now.
Once again I'll say it looks like this is a ploy by the disgruntled opposition parties to try and gain a "Mulligan" (do over) because they just can't stand the thought of a Conservative Government.
Robocalls part ?
As the robocalls "scandal" continues, I decided to add my 2 "non-cents" to the mix. Now although I did receive robocalls during the 2011 Federal election, I have no recollection of what was said, as I'm sure most of the 31000 new complaints don't. But I sent an obviously phoney complaint to the "paper" soliciting them, in attempt to show them the ridiculous effort they are attempting.
I also noticed the way this "paper" is leading people to submit these complaints quickly, or the nasty Conservatives will "get away with it".
I also noticed the way this "paper" is leading people to submit these complaints quickly, or the nasty Conservatives will "get away with it".
With such an obvious Left bias, I have a hard time calling this anything close to "news". The Globe and Mail called me soliciting a subscription just a few days ago, and ovbiously my response was "Not friggin likely!"
Touching on some fudged numbers.
I'm going to start by addressing the first issue, which is the
right to vote. If you don't exercise that right, then by default you
have decided to accept the will of those who do vote, and therefore
you are no longer counted in the final decision. I happened to be
directed to the Marxist Leninist Party, which was complaining how the
Conservatives didn't get a majority of votes.
Some of their numbers went like this;
The 2011 election was riddled with cries of how this from basically all opposition parties, who seem to have forgotten what kind of democracy we live in. This is easily explained away: It's called the “First past the post” system. This means that with more than 2 parties running (and sometimes there can be a number of fringe parties that run in Canada), the winner of the most votes OUT OF ALL OF THEM is considered the winner.
If we WERE to have a 2 party system, as it stands right now there would be no Liberal Party, Bloc or Green party in the House of Commons. And in this scenario the total number of voters that voted “anything but Conservative” would actually have a majority Government in Canada. These facts are sadly negligent in arguments from other parties who would rather not see the Conservative's take their rightful place as a Majority Government in the House of Commons.
On to the fraud perpetrated by these particular numbers.
Some of their numbers went like this;
Voter turn-out of 14,720,580 out of
23,971,740 registered electors or 61.4%
Harper's Conservatives received
5,832,401 votes, representing 24.3% of the eligible voters
Voters who cast their ballots for
candidates other than those of the Conservative Party
totaled 8,888,179, representing 60.4%
(emphasis mine)
The 2011 election was riddled with cries of how this from basically all opposition parties, who seem to have forgotten what kind of democracy we live in. This is easily explained away: It's called the “First past the post” system. This means that with more than 2 parties running (and sometimes there can be a number of fringe parties that run in Canada), the winner of the most votes OUT OF ALL OF THEM is considered the winner.
If we WERE to have a 2 party system, as it stands right now there would be no Liberal Party, Bloc or Green party in the House of Commons. And in this scenario the total number of voters that voted “anything but Conservative” would actually have a majority Government in Canada. These facts are sadly negligent in arguments from other parties who would rather not see the Conservative's take their rightful place as a Majority Government in the House of Commons.
On to the fraud perpetrated by these particular numbers.
- If you notice they are counting all voters in the equation, in effort to dilute the percentage of the number of votes received by the Conservative Party.
- They also inflate the number of those who voted against the Conservative's by clumping votes for ALL the rest of the parties together as if they were a single unit.
Monday, February 27, 2012
Robocall reports expected to grow.
As the "Robocall" controversy continues I think I am starting to peace the puzzle together here. I remember hearing about these calls right after the election, but they were (as they should have been) passed on to Elections Canada for investigation and prosecution. However the recent activities going on in the House Of Commons, such as bills being passed in which the opposition lives up to it's name and vehemently opposes, or limits on debate for the sake of progress, seem to indicate to me a level of frustration within the opposition parties that would make use of a scandal to try to question the validity of the 2011 Election.
Yes you read it correctly, I am implying that the opposition parties are possibly colluding in a fraud against the Canadian people through false information and newly acquired outrage at a scandal which has been under investigation for some time now.
I think the greatest indicator of deception towards this scandal is the bluster and outrage that both the Liberals and NDP are putting forth in a seemingly collaborative effort to discredit the Conservative Government. This appears to me to be nothing more than a political scheme to create (as one blogger says “more anti-Conservative fearmongering”), albeit the fact that these calls were obviously fraudulent and must be investigated and prosecuted, it seems evident that the Opposition parties are trying to whip up a frenzy over the issue for an obvious purpose, a by-election (or even further a completely new election). I also question the newly rising numbers they are claiming, which started at 18 Ridings, then to 27 Ridings on February 25th, then 34 Ridings on February 27th. Again it seems to me very convenient, and I think they are probably manufactured to make the issue seem worse than it actually is (typical politics).
There have now been accounts brought forward of calls byConservative center employees (anonymously of course) who said they were “forced” to make these calls, despite their objections to the supervisory staff, and calls to the RCMP. You have to wonder what kept these poor people working at doing something they thought was wrong, and why they continued even when they disagreed with it or knew it was illegal? Yeah, I'm calling BS here too, mostly because the timing really makes it smell like the Opposition tactic to thicken the plot, but also because I think no honest citizen would continue to do something dishonest just because they were told to “stick to the script”.
There have been Conservatives that have received “Robocalls” too during the past election, now granted it appears that none of them fell for it, or they had the presence of mind to verify the information.
But let's touch on something else; It was not only the Conservatives who would have benefited greatly from these misleading calls, the Orange wave stood to gain as well, and being an the overlooked third party the spotlight usually glanced right over them. This is especially true when you note that there are more Conservatives which have received “robocalls” too.
So far my hypothesis has the same weight as the evidence given so far in this “scandal”, I may or may not be correct, but there are other logical options when proof is not required.
Yes you read it correctly, I am implying that the opposition parties are possibly colluding in a fraud against the Canadian people through false information and newly acquired outrage at a scandal which has been under investigation for some time now.
I think the greatest indicator of deception towards this scandal is the bluster and outrage that both the Liberals and NDP are putting forth in a seemingly collaborative effort to discredit the Conservative Government. This appears to me to be nothing more than a political scheme to create (as one blogger says “more anti-Conservative fearmongering”), albeit the fact that these calls were obviously fraudulent and must be investigated and prosecuted, it seems evident that the Opposition parties are trying to whip up a frenzy over the issue for an obvious purpose, a by-election (or even further a completely new election). I also question the newly rising numbers they are claiming, which started at 18 Ridings, then to 27 Ridings on February 25th, then 34 Ridings on February 27th. Again it seems to me very convenient, and I think they are probably manufactured to make the issue seem worse than it actually is (typical politics).
There have now been accounts brought forward of calls byConservative center employees (anonymously of course) who said they were “forced” to make these calls, despite their objections to the supervisory staff, and calls to the RCMP. You have to wonder what kept these poor people working at doing something they thought was wrong, and why they continued even when they disagreed with it or knew it was illegal? Yeah, I'm calling BS here too, mostly because the timing really makes it smell like the Opposition tactic to thicken the plot, but also because I think no honest citizen would continue to do something dishonest just because they were told to “stick to the script”.
There have been Conservatives that have received “Robocalls” too during the past election, now granted it appears that none of them fell for it, or they had the presence of mind to verify the information.
But let's touch on something else; It was not only the Conservatives who would have benefited greatly from these misleading calls, the Orange wave stood to gain as well, and being an the overlooked third party the spotlight usually glanced right over them. This is especially true when you note that there are more Conservatives which have received “robocalls” too.
So far my hypothesis has the same weight as the evidence given so far in this “scandal”, I may or may not be correct, but there are other logical options when proof is not required.
Sunday, February 26, 2012
"Robo" BullS***.
Yes folks, you heard correctly! I am calling ROBO-BS on both Liberals and NDP! Here's my Rationale.
Feb 24 there was 18 ridings, Feb 26th there was 27 ridings, and as I pointed out yesterday on my own twitter feed today we now se the number rise again to 34 ridings. The hypocrisy here is Frank Valeriote talking about the "convenience" for this to happen in Conservative riding, when the numbers semm to be "conveniently" rising as the days go on to support their position. I guarantee that there will be more ridings "conveniently" come into the spotlight from both NDP and Liberals before this is done. But the endgame has already been revealed by the loose lipped King of Vitriolic Rhetoric, Pat Martin (who has the gall to speak of ethics or standards let alone both together in this video), the agenda is another election! (Vancouver Observer)
Now on to the failed logic of the Liberals in how "convenient" these numbers are; Remember that the claim was that these calls were in "close race" ridings where the Liberals lost. With a Tory majority, the most simple of logic say that these calls would have unquestionably happened in Conservative ridings, especially if the race was close.
The one problem we are going to have getting to the bottom of this "Robo-call" issue will be the manufacturing of evidence for political gain, which is as much of a fraud as the calls themselves.
Feb 24 there was 18 ridings, Feb 26th there was 27 ridings, and as I pointed out yesterday on my own twitter feed today we now se the number rise again to 34 ridings. The hypocrisy here is Frank Valeriote talking about the "convenience" for this to happen in Conservative riding, when the numbers semm to be "conveniently" rising as the days go on to support their position. I guarantee that there will be more ridings "conveniently" come into the spotlight from both NDP and Liberals before this is done. But the endgame has already been revealed by the loose lipped King of Vitriolic Rhetoric, Pat Martin (who has the gall to speak of ethics or standards let alone both together in this video), the agenda is another election! (Vancouver Observer)
Now on to the failed logic of the Liberals in how "convenient" these numbers are; Remember that the claim was that these calls were in "close race" ridings where the Liberals lost. With a Tory majority, the most simple of logic say that these calls would have unquestionably happened in Conservative ridings, especially if the race was close.
The one problem we are going to have getting to the bottom of this "Robo-call" issue will be the manufacturing of evidence for political gain, which is as much of a fraud as the calls themselves.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
A common theme.
One thing I've noticed since the Tories took office, is the Opposition parties (especially those that consider themselves the "natural Governing party) to cast blam on the Conservatives for things they themselves had no interest in fixing while they had the chance. Yet again the Leader of the Liberal party is "Shocked and amazed" at how the Conservatives have let something like Attawapiskat happen, failing to accept his own responsibility of neglegence.
Sun News puts it across quite plainly, and it's been a trend I've seen since before the Tories took a majority. Rae ignores history.
Bob
Sun News puts it across quite plainly, and it's been a trend I've seen since before the Tories took a majority. Rae ignores history.
Bob
Friday, December 16, 2011
The "Harper Government" must be doing a lot right...
When one of the major complaints against it is the appropriation of media terminology "The Harper Government".
The major negative media buzz has been trivial inconsequential items against the Conservatives time as a majority Government. The biggest buzzes revolve around;
1. The profanity of the NDP Opposistion party. The Globe and Mail.
2. The use of media terminology "The Harper Government". The Globe and Mail.
3. The profanity of the Liberal party. Huffington post.
Now maybe it's the type of people reposting stuff like this, or maybe this is the best that these media outlets can come up with. Whatever the case may be, these articles say a lot about how well the Conservative Government is now running the country. When you have to "find things" to blame on the Government, it says 2 things: 1. the Government is doing well. 2. The quality of the media outlet by what they print.
I start to wonder if the "Other Side of the House of Commons" is "winning" much like Charlie Sheen and the reporters of these stories.
Bob
The major negative media buzz has been trivial inconsequential items against the Conservatives time as a majority Government. The biggest buzzes revolve around;
1. The profanity of the NDP Opposistion party. The Globe and Mail.
2. The use of media terminology "The Harper Government". The Globe and Mail.
3. The profanity of the Liberal party. Huffington post.
Now maybe it's the type of people reposting stuff like this, or maybe this is the best that these media outlets can come up with. Whatever the case may be, these articles say a lot about how well the Conservative Government is now running the country. When you have to "find things" to blame on the Government, it says 2 things: 1. the Government is doing well. 2. The quality of the media outlet by what they print.
I start to wonder if the "Other Side of the House of Commons" is "winning" much like Charlie Sheen and the reporters of these stories.
Bob
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
The Cabinet comes out today for the new CPC Majority Government.
First thing I noticed as I listen to CPAC; The 2 Opposition parties (that are left in Parl) strategists are coming back with the same old rhetoricic about "why the Government fell in the 40th Parlaiment, which obviously didn't fly with a plurality of Canadians. It's not like this hasn't been discredited throughout the Election Campaign, and you can see by the results that the propaganda that "The Government fell because it was in contempt of Parliament" was seen through by the voters for what it was, bunk (a ploy, a farce, a kangaroo court of Opposition members in committee who weren't getting exactly what they wanted and weren't going to stand for it any longer.)
The second thing I noticed, and this seems to be trending lately among the media; It's more about the reporters than it is about the news. This is a disturbing trend of narcissism within the Main Stream Media which should be making viewers/readers wary of both quality and quantity of the information these self important reporters/media outlets are presenting to them.
Here is the Cabinet for the 41st Parlaiment from the website of the Prime Minister.
The second thing I noticed, and this seems to be trending lately among the media; It's more about the reporters than it is about the news. This is a disturbing trend of narcissism within the Main Stream Media which should be making viewers/readers wary of both quality and quantity of the information these self important reporters/media outlets are presenting to them.
Here is the Cabinet for the 41st Parlaiment from the website of the Prime Minister.
The Ministry
Prime Minister of Canada | |
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada | |
Leader of the Government in the Senate | |
Minister of National Defence | |
Minister of Public Safety | |
Minister of Public Works and Government Services and Minister for Status of Women | |
Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development | |
Minister of International Cooperation | |
Minister of Foreign Affairs | |
President of the Treasury Board and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario | |
Minister of Finance | |
Leader of the Government in the House of Commons | |
Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism | |
Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board | |
Minister of Industry and Minister of State (Agriculture) | |
Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages | |
Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec | |
Minister of Health and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency | |
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans and Minister for the Atlantic Gateway | |
Minister of the Environment | |
Minister of Labour | |
Minister of National Revenue | |
Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development | |
Minister of Veterans Affairs | |
Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway | |
Minister of Natural Resources | |
Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada | |
Associate Minister of National Defence | |
Minister of State (Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency) (La Francophonie) | |
Minister of State and Chief Government Whip | |
Minister of State (Small Business and Tourism) | |
Minister of State of Foreign Affairs (Americas and Consular Affairs) | |
Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification) | |
Minister of State (Transport) | |
Minister of State (Science and Technology) (Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario) | |
Minister of State (Finance) | |
Minister of State (Democratic Reform) | |
Minister of State (Seniors) | |
Minister of State (Sport) |
Tuesday, May 03, 2011
Prophesy fulfilled.
About 2 hours after the election results started coming into Saskatchewan Michael Ignatieff indicated that he was going to resign as leader of the Liberal party. Man, I TOTALLY called that!! When the House decided to push an election I even tweeted my goodbyes to Iggy right off, letting him know that I thought this election would be his folly.
Now I'll be honest, I had NO expectation that the NDP would MASSACRE both the Liberals AND the Bloc (especially after having read their platform). I expect the Dippers to pull up somewhere around 70, I coulnd't get a feel for Libs or Bloc though. I even expected the Conservatives to pull a slight Majority 157-159, but I am THRILLED with the extra 167 seat territory!!
What a great turn of events for both the Country, and the Conservative party! Time to get some work done.
Bob
Now I'll be honest, I had NO expectation that the NDP would MASSACRE both the Liberals AND the Bloc (especially after having read their platform). I expect the Dippers to pull up somewhere around 70, I coulnd't get a feel for Libs or Bloc though. I even expected the Conservatives to pull a slight Majority 157-159, but I am THRILLED with the extra 167 seat territory!!
What a great turn of events for both the Country, and the Conservative party! Time to get some work done.
Bob
Sunday, May 01, 2011
Voting, both a right AND a responsibility.
Today as I was reading through some blogs on the impending election, I wandered acoss one that reminded me why the push for people to "just vote!" is wrong. This Blogger (whom I don't know, and this was my first visit to their site) said "I have always reflexively cringed whenever I hear blather about forcing our youth to vote.".
But I go a step further, and express how I cringe thinking about how many people out there will be voting based on propaganda!! In watching and participating in some of the social media punditry (of which when I include myself I use the term loosely) on Twitter, my initial assessment has been confirmed. I have maintained that the general population is swayed more by emotion than logic, which is why:
A. Attack ads are used
B. There has been a surge in NDP popularity.
I have always been a staunch proponent of "informed voting", which means I read party platforms and watch performances in the House of Commons. I am by NO MEANS a political junkie like some others, but I feel it is all of our responsibilities to make sure we know where the parties stand before we make our decisions. As I've said in previous posts, this was the first year I have ever even considered reading an NDP platform because this is the first time in history I have ever felt that they may have serious influence in the House (even in an opposition capacity). Now I don't go into detailed critiques of the platforms, I look for things that stand out both good and bad. But at least I look at what the parties are offering, and base my decision on the plan I feel is best for the Country.
However the same cannot be said for the majority of Canadians, and this is where Democracy #hashtagfails, and this is especially true when it comes to pushing people to vote.
I think it can be generally applied that people don't like attack ads. How can we make these ads irrelevant? It's simple, make Government a part of your day everyday. Watch CPAC, or read Hansard (however I recommend avoiding Question period, because that is a full hour of attack ads that doesn't really get anything done.) Spend an hour looking through proposed and passed bills for the day instead of watching TV for that hour. I mean what could it hurt to give an hour a day for your Country?
When their is an election, read the parties platforms. Get informed, because voting is about more than just getting out and marking a ballot, and it's more than whether or not you like a candidate or a leader, it's about the future of OUR COUNTRY!!!
Get serious, and GET INFORMED! And then go vote!
Conservative Platform.
Liberal Platform.
NDP platform.
Bob
But I go a step further, and express how I cringe thinking about how many people out there will be voting based on propaganda!! In watching and participating in some of the social media punditry (of which when I include myself I use the term loosely) on Twitter, my initial assessment has been confirmed. I have maintained that the general population is swayed more by emotion than logic, which is why:
A. Attack ads are used
B. There has been a surge in NDP popularity.
I have always been a staunch proponent of "informed voting", which means I read party platforms and watch performances in the House of Commons. I am by NO MEANS a political junkie like some others, but I feel it is all of our responsibilities to make sure we know where the parties stand before we make our decisions. As I've said in previous posts, this was the first year I have ever even considered reading an NDP platform because this is the first time in history I have ever felt that they may have serious influence in the House (even in an opposition capacity). Now I don't go into detailed critiques of the platforms, I look for things that stand out both good and bad. But at least I look at what the parties are offering, and base my decision on the plan I feel is best for the Country.
However the same cannot be said for the majority of Canadians, and this is where Democracy #hashtagfails, and this is especially true when it comes to pushing people to vote.
I think it can be generally applied that people don't like attack ads. How can we make these ads irrelevant? It's simple, make Government a part of your day everyday. Watch CPAC, or read Hansard (however I recommend avoiding Question period, because that is a full hour of attack ads that doesn't really get anything done.) Spend an hour looking through proposed and passed bills for the day instead of watching TV for that hour. I mean what could it hurt to give an hour a day for your Country?
When their is an election, read the parties platforms. Get informed, because voting is about more than just getting out and marking a ballot, and it's more than whether or not you like a candidate or a leader, it's about the future of OUR COUNTRY!!!
Get serious, and GET INFORMED! And then go vote!
Conservative Platform.
Liberal Platform.
NDP platform.
Bob
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




